© 2000

While there are many people who have contributed to the growth of ski mountaineering in America, few were more instrumental than Paul Ramer. It was his vision, more than any other single man’s which accurately defined, perhaps prophesied, the current landscape of the sport. Some of you reading this became aware of backcountry skiing through more contemporary voices, but they all stood on the developments and ideas first promoted in America by Paul Ramer.

Against America’s tidal wave of enthusiasm for Telemark, Paul was adamant that Alpine Touring (AT) was the way, not Nordic. It was an uphill battle all the way. Steve Barnett’s book “Cross-Country Downhill” distilled the enthusiasm for backcountry skiing in 1976, and his choice of telemark gear cast the mold for those who followed. He was just following Ric Borkovec, who chose Nordic as a rehab option to a ski injury, and then found exhilaration in the freedom it provided. Others, like Doug Robinson, Paul Parker, and Alan Bard began to wax eloquent on the telemark turn and the die seemed cast. When the first all-plastic telemark boot arrived, the Terminator, American interest in AT practically dissolved.

Paul Ramer never wavered. He knew that alpine skiing would remain the major discipline because he wasn’t promoting cross-country skiing with downhill turns thrown in, he was promoting downhill skiing with a free-heel thrown in for mountaineering caliber cross-country mobility outside the resorts. Unfortunately, he was about 20 years ahead of his time and the fruit of his labors and ideas didn’t catch fire in America until the last years of his life.

My introduction to Paul came as it did for most of us, through his binding. The mountains beckoned, I responded and in short order knew I wanted a binding that provided everything I had in my alpine bindings — locked heel performance and safety release — plus a free-heel for skinning uphill. The Ramer Classic looked like an erector set sort of contraption, but once I accepted it was the best option at the time, my faith in its performance was never disappointed.

It led, inevitably to my own efforts to proselytize ski mountaineering through my involvement with a section of southern California’s Sierra Club, The Alpine Ski Touring Committee, a group led by my personal mentor, John Wedberg, which led to the creation of a newsletter, Le Chronicle du Couloir, which became Couloir magazine.

While most readers of Couloir were of the telemark persuasion, that was only because at the time 80% of American backcountry skiers were using telemark gear. Throughout it all I believed as Paul Ramer did, that the future was with Alpine Touring equipment. It didn’t require any new skiing skills, just a new binding and climbing skins.

In fact, what few people realize is that part of the motivation for starting Couloir was, despite my own eventual preference for telemark, to promote the sport of ski mountaineering all the way to the extreme level, for which alpine equipment is clearly superior. While telemark gear has shown it can keep up, it has not raised the bar for performance in the ski mountaineering realm. Besides, Paul’s main point, that it was simply easier for more people was also undeniable. That premise, more than anything else was why I chose to promote the alpine aspect of backcountry skiing because only by making the switch to backcountry skiing easy, which AT gear does, could the sport hope to achieve any sort of momentum and viable growth.

Thus, in launching EarnYourTurns.com it seems fitting to start at the beginning, with a tribute to one of the men who helped make the sport what it is today, and who was instrumental in my involvement, even the very inspiration for the “earn your turns” mantra.

On the following page, a rerun of an interview with Paul Ramer, first published in Couloir magazine Vol. XII-5, Spring 2000.

Paul Ramer: Crazy, like a fox.
By Craig Dostie
Originally published in Couloir, vol. XII-5, Spring 2000
(Click here for a reformatted PDF of this original article).

Perhaps the most common characteristic of genius is being ahead of the times. If that’s so, then Paul Ramer entered the new millennium long ago.

If there is one thing you can say about Paul it’s that he isn’t afraid to stand behind crazy ideas or products that no one had ever heard of before but that he’s convinced people will appreciate. Paul’s passion for the sport has fueled a genius for invention that spawned over a dozen patents for backcountry products that had never before been considered necessary. Some 20-plus years later, we consider many of these inventions standard equipment. Most notable among these is the heel elevator, an integral part of his most popular invention, the Ramer Classic binding.

The Classic had several versions, culminating in the MT-2000. Ahead of its time in the late ‘70s, production ceased on Ramer bindings in 1995. But key design elements live on. The MT-2000 heel mechanism can now be found in Fritchi’s Diamir. The classic ball-and-socket retention system at the toe is now in the Dynafit binding system, only inverted.

Ramer Assault Snowshoes™, stamped from metal and patented in 1981, have emerged in a plastic version called Verts™. Like the original, they climb snow like crampons climb ice—fast! He developed a self-arrest grip, admittedly for the few, proud, or strange among us, which is now available on Life Link’s Variant ski pole line. Ramer made poles too, only with a push-button adjustment. They whistled in the wind but were hell to break.

Though he didn’t invent it, Ramer developed the Echo-1, a cheap, effective (though crude by modern standards) avalanche beacon. He knew enough to develop a better beacon, but his much touted revision, the Avalert, never made it to market.

In the ‘80s, Alpine Research catalogs were the update report on Ramer product revisions, plus all the widgets Paul thought you might need, from climbing skins to earplugs. His ’86 catalog showed a Euro snowmobile for sale. At the time we all scoffed and thought Paul was off his rocker. But he realized that as more people went into the backcountry, some would opt to use motors to extend the trailhead for deep, fast adventure skiing.

As a businessman, Ramer was quick to admit his failings. In the ‘80s he had good cash flow with a military contract to build an antiquated cable binding for the U.S. Army. It was the backing he needed to promote the sport he loved. Before anyone knew it, Ramer had managed to seed several thousand pairs of Ramer Classic bindings around the world. But when the military contract dried up, Alpine Research Inc. was forced to survive on the niche backcountry ski market, where mistakes are difficult to recover from.

With a host of bad PR from the decline of his backcountry business, Paul formed a business partnership with his daughter, Kris, in 1996. Their new company, Zardoz NOTwax, LLC, sells his most recent patent, a revolutionary lubricant for skiing and snowboarding that he dubbed NOTwax™.

In 1993 I interviewed Paul Ramer. His insight hadn’t lost its edge, and as you will see, time only proves his prophetic vision.

Couloir: How did you get into skiing?
Ramer: I never really learned to ski until I was in college (Swarthmore, PA) where we had a good outing club. We used to go up to the Adirondacks and up to Vermont for spring break.

When I came out to Colorado in 1970, I went on a snowshoeing trip. When I got to the top of the hill and looked down, I said, “This is really dumb. Now I gotta walk back down.” And that was the last time I went snowshoeing. We started using our downhill skis for touring. There weren’t any touring bindings available then, but there were a few Silvretta cable bindings floating around.

C: How did you come up with the idea for a touring binding?
R: Well, the main thing I hated about touring equipment was the boots. The binding came along because there weren’t any bindings to work with a boot I developed from Scott™ boot parts. So I started playing around. I made bindings out of lots of different parts until I came up with what is now the Ramer Classic. Now, that’s a pretty good example of an invention. The tuning fork design originally had these big aluminum bars on the side with a spring and a bolt on it so that the bars would spread and depress the spring. But what I discovered very quickly was the bars would flex before the spring. I wasn’t intentionally looking for that effect.

Then the same thing happened with the heel elevators. There were no heel elevators before the Model R. In fact, I used to get in these long arguments with Europeans who would say “What’s the point of having a heel elevator? Skins won’t climb any steeper than 20 degrees.” Of course, the reason was because they didn’t have an heel elevator. A few years later they realized that it was a nice thing to have, and now you can’t buy an AT binding without one.

But that was also an inadvertent development. Originally it was an energy recovery device. It was a big coil spring and you’d walk on the coil spring as you were going uphill. Your weight would compress the spring, and when you went up you would kind of bounce off of it. The only problem was that there was only one speed and that was real, real fast. So it was real efficient and you could go like a bat out of hell uphill, but you wore out real quick too. Then I started putting a plug down inside the spring to see what that would do, and that’s where the heel elevator came from.

When I finally decided to get into it as a business, people were really interested in the binding, not the boot. It was just too bizarre. When the Ramer binding first came out, back in ’74, that was the first alpine touring binding that had full release and a climbing peg. That was the aluminum binding, the old Model-R. At that time the Izer binding had just come out too.

C: Any more comments on your bindings?

R: Well, the whole purpose of developing this kind of equipment is access. It is not to have something new and really not equipment-oriented at all. Equipment is supposed to be invisible. It is purely utilitarian. It sounds silly to talk that way, but then, why are ski bindings not considered utilitarian?

Because ski companies are trying to come up with reasons to convince people to consume more of their product, and the only way they can do that is to make it different somehow—make it sexier, make it more faddish—and that’s the basis of consumption. I’ve just never ascribed to consumption theory.

C: Would you consider yourself an inventor or a skier that tinkers with stuff?
R: I’m primarily an inventor, secondarily a product developer, and finally a business person. Of course, that’s one of the reasons why I keep running into so many problems with the business—‘cause I really have less desire to deal with the business than I do to promote the fun aspects of the sport.

C: When did you go into business for yourself?
R: Well, Alpine Research Inc. began in 1974 and we got serious in 1975.

C: Were you working a second job at the time?
R: Yeah, I was a senior research engineer in Rocky Flats making robots with Dow. They lost their contract, Rockwell came in, and the local engineers got laid off. So I had five months’ severance pay and figured it might be fun to try and run my own business. I’ve been trying ever since.

C: Where do you see adventure skiing headed?
R: Downhill skiers in the U.S. are going to become more and more dissatisfied with the lack of wilderness experience they get at the big ski circuses. They’re gong to start getting hungry for something a little more interesting, but they want to do it on downhill gear. They don’t want to learn a new sport, they want to take what they know and feel comfortable with and expand on it.

C: What will it take for this sport to grow?
R: The sport will require a shift of attitude from being some kind of extreme, yahoo, wild thing for extreme skiers to this is a fun thing to do for anybody. There are always people who are going to do extreme skiing and stuff like that, but the emphasis needs to be more on the satisfaction of just being in the mountains. For me, the most powerful part of it is being free to do whatever you want to do.

C: What do you want to be remembered for?
R: I’m afraid I’m stuck with being remembered for all the gear I’ve put together. Now, if you consider that a person is actually constituted of the conversations that they’re associated with, then I’m going to live a lot longer than I will in reality, whether I like it or not.

Although Paul’s gear legacy is already cast, the shadow of Paul’s spirit is at the root of the current renaissance in adventure skiing. Russell Rainey, inventor the SuperLoop binding, says of Ramer, “The biggest contribution Paul made to backcountry skiing was his promotion of the sport. Second, of course, was all the stuff that he developed.”

At the time this was written, Paul had been diagnosed with Creutzfeldt-Jacob Disease, a degenerative disease of the brain. It took him from us in March, 2000. He was only 56.